Baptist institutions stand, wait on mandate solution
    August 11 2016 by Tom Strode, Baptist Press

    Southern Baptist-affiliated institutions are maintaining their stand against the Obama administration’s abortion/contraception mandate while they continue to wait for a satisfactory legal resolution.
     
    GuideStone Financial Resources and four Baptist universities – East Texas Baptist, Houston Baptist, Oklahoma Baptist and Truett McConnell – are among 92 nonprofit religious organizations awaiting what they hope will be an agreement with the federal government that protects their freedom of conscience.
     
    As they have for years, the Southern Baptist-affiliated institutions object to a rule implementing the 2010 health-care law that requires employers to provide their workers with coverage for contraceptives with mechanisms that can potentially induce abortions. They filed suit in opposition to what they consider to be the administration’s unsatisfactory accommodation of that objection.
     
    The U.S. Supreme Court gave hope to the religious objectors in mid-May when it nullified multiple, unfavorable federal appeals court decisions and blocked the administration from imposing fines on the institutions. The justices told the appeals courts involved to give the parties an opportunity to reach a solution “that accommodates petitioners’ religious exercise while at the same time ensuring that women covered by petitioners’ health plans receive full and equal health coverage, including contraceptive coverage.”
     
    Initial discussions have occurred between the administration and the religious objectors, but there are no developments to report, according to the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which represents Oklahoma Baptist University and other institutions.
     
    “[I]t’s too soon to tell” whether to be hopeful about the negotiations, ADF Senior Counsel Gregory Baylor told Baptist Press (BP).
     
    The religious institutions cited in briefs filed with the high court before its May order some various ways the objectionable drugs and devices could be provided without violating their consciences, but the central question is whether the administration will back away from its position before the justices “that the current way was the only way that was acceptable” to it, Baylor said.
     
    The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty – which represents the other Southern Baptist-affiliated institutions – was encouraged by the Supreme Court’s actions in response to a mandate that from the start intruded on the religious organizations’ desire to fulfill their mission “in accordance with their faith,” said Eric Rassbach, deputy general counsel.
     
    The rule issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) “put them into this impossible situation where basically as a condition of helping the poor or providing people with a Christian education like East Texas Baptist University or Houston Baptist University or providing health-care services like GuideStone, ... they were going to have do something that they thought was sinful,” Rassbach told BP. “So ultimately they’re trying not to sin.”
     
    Southern Baptist ethicist Russell Moore said the federal government is making an “audacious claim” with its mandate – “that these ministries misunderstand their own faith and that they can deliver these drugs without disobeying God.”
     
    “But part of the reason why Southern Baptists have always stood for religious liberty is precisely because it is not the government’s job to give us a lesson in theology,” said Moore, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC).
     
    “I, for one, do not believe that the federal government understands what it means to be Baptist better than GuideStone and our Baptist colleges,” he said in written comments for BP. “A state that can intrude on the beliefs of some can intrude on the beliefs of all, and this mandate should be recognized for the unlawful overreach that it is.”
     
    Their commitment to religious freedom and the sanctity of human life is at the heart of why their institutions are willing to resist the federal government’s intrusion despite the threats of millions of dollars in fines, said representatives of the Baptist universities and GuideStone, the SBC’s health and financial benefits entity.
     
    “For us it is a matter of conscience,” East Texas Baptist President Blair Blackburn said in an email interview. “ETBU believes in freedom of belief for all religions. That includes everybody, but it ought to include Baptists too. Our mission is to provide excellent Christ-centered education to our students, and that means being able to follow our beliefs in everything we do.”
     
    Emir Caner, president of Truett McConnell, told BP by email the mandate “goes against our values based in the sufficiency of Scripture. As such, we will continue to stand on our principles, fight for life and liberty, and rely on our Lord for the consequences.”
     
    Robert Sloan, president of Houston Baptist, said the school has “a strong commitment to life.”
     
    “That’s a sincerely held religious belief. We think that’s right at the heart of our historic identity,” Sloan said in a phone interview. “We should not be forced to conform to the government’s ideological views about life.”
     
    HHS provided an exemption to the mandate for churches and their auxiliaries but did not extend it to non-church-related, nonprofit organizations that object – such as the Baptist colleges. The latest of nearly 10 accommodations proposed by HHS requires the nonprofits to provide written notification they meet the requirements for an accommodation, which forces the nonprofit’s insurer or a third-party administrator to provide contraceptive coverage.
     
    For the Baptist objectors, the accommodation remains unsatisfactory.
     
    The accommodation was “a mere administrative sleight of hand that still forced GuideStone to violate our religious convictions,” said Harold R. Loftin, the entity’s chief legal officer.
     
    “Under the so-called accommodation, the government was empowered to take control of our medical plan, to have access to the names and addresses of those enrolled in our plan, and to direct the administrator of our medical plan to provide all 20 contraceptive drugs and devices to those in our plan,” Loftin told BP in email comments.
     
    The federal government has “innumerable ways” to provide potentially abortion-inducing drugs and devices “without commandeering our medical plan and forcing us to provide services that violate our religious convictions,” he said.
     
    Oklahoma Baptist told BP by email the accommodation “was really no accommodation at all. It simply required us to comply with the mandate in another way.”
     
    All representatives of the Baptist entities told BP they were encouraged by the Supreme Court’s May order, and they all acknowledged there are reasons for Southern Baptists to pray as the parties seek resolution.
     
    GuideStone President O.S. Hawkins asked the “Southern Baptist family to pray for favor with the regulators in the case, that our legal team continues to have clarity of mind as they petition on our behalf and that we will continue to represent the ministries with integrity and skill.”
     
    Caner said, “We continue to pray for boldness and, if God wills, deliverance. If the next generation is to enjoy religious liberty, this generation must stand for these liberties against the popular view of America’s declining culture.”
     
    Oklahoma Baptist requested prayer for the lawyers representing objectors to the mandate and “for our Christian universities to remain strong and faithful to our convictions and for our continuing freedom to peacefully operate according to our beliefs without fear of penalties by the government.”
     
    Blackburn asked for prayer that those in the administration and courts “will find a way to honor the Supreme Court’s command to find a way to protect our conscience and the consciences of the other religious institutions.”
     
    For Sloan, prayers should be offered that Southern Baptists and their churches “will teach the Scriptures, and we will be clear with ourselves and our children what we actually believe, because these kinds of decisions by the courts actually reflect culture at least as much as they influence culture.”
     
    “We’ve got a lot of work to do, I think,” Sloan said. “We have to have a greater dependence upon Scripture. We have to have serious Bible study and teaching. We have to depend on the work of the Scripture and the Spirit. We need to support solid, seriously scripturally faithful institutions in education.”
     
    The federally approved contraceptives for which coverage is required include the intrauterine device (IUD) and such drugs as Plan B, the “morning-after” pill. Both the IUD and “morning-after” pill possess post-fertilization mechanisms that potentially can cause abortions by preventing implantation of tiny embryos. The rule also covers “ella,” which – in a fashion similar to the abortion drug RU 486 – can act even after implantation to end the life of the child.
     
    GuideStone is exempt from the HHS rule, but it serves ministries that are required to obey the mandate, including Truett McConnell.
     
    (EDITOR’S NOTE – Tom Strode is Washington bureau chief for Baptist Press, the Southern Baptist Convention’s news service.)
     
    Related articles:
    GuideStone appeals to SCOTUS over abortion mandate
    Court ponders religious liberty in HHS mandate
     

    8/11/2016 9:34:05 AM by Tom Strode, Baptist Press | with 0 comments
    Filed under: Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, GuideStone Financial Resources, U.S. Supreme Court




Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.
Subscribe
 Security code