Same-sex marriage will lead to moral dystopia
    February 2 2015 by David Gibson, Religion News Service

    A high-profile alliance of conservative Catholics and evangelical Protestants is set to issue a sweeping manifesto against gay marriage that calls same-sex unions “a graver threat” than divorce or cohabitation, one that will lead to a moral dystopia in America and the persecution of traditional believers.
    “If the truth about marriage can be displaced by social and political pressure operating through the law, other truths can be set aside as well,” say the nearly 50 signers of the statement, which is to be published in the March edition of the conservative journal First Things.
    “And that displacement can lead, in due course, to the coercion and persecution of those who refuse to acknowledge the state’s redefinition of marriage, which is beyond the state’s competence,” they say.


    Religion News Service photo courtesy of First Things
    The Rev. Richard John Neuhaus, one of the leading conservative theologians in the U.S. Catholic Church, died Jan. 8 at age 72.

    The declaration adds that some people “are already being censured and others have lost their jobs because of their public commitment to marriage as the union of a man and a woman.”
    Social conservatives have rallied around a number of cases that they say herald a gloomy future, including the recent dismissal of the fire chief in Atlanta, who had given employees a copy of his book in which he detailed his beliefs, based on his Christian faith, that homosexuality was “vile.”
    Other cases include a New Mexico photographer who lost her fight to opt out of taking pictures of a same-sex wedding; bakers and florists who wanted to turn away gay customers; and an Idaho wedding chapel whose Christian owners wanted to conduct only heterosexual weddings.
    This latest statement, The Two Shall Become One Flesh: Reclaiming Marriage, comes from the group Evangelicals and Catholics Together (ECT), a coalition formed in 1994 under the aegis of former Nixon aide Charles Colson, an evangelical, and Richard John Neuhaus, a Catholic priest.
    One of their goals was to encourage the two Christian communities to overcome their historical suspicions and doctrinal differences in order to battle what they saw as a growing moral laxity in the U.S.
    Neuhaus died in 2009, and Colson in 2012, but the movement has continued and in some ways has become more focused as Christian conservatives have grown increasingly united in their alarm over the sudden and spreading acceptance of gay rights, especially same-sex marriage.
    Discussions on a document on same-sex marriage began in June 2013 – the same month the U.S. Supreme Court required the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages – according to Russell Reno, editor of First Things and a member of ECT.
    But Reno said the members first had to agree to set aside their differences on the legitimacy of divorce and contraception, for example, and even whether marriage is a sacrament.
    That enabled them to focus on the advance of gay marriage, which they say not only betrays religious tradition but, more than any other development, undermines society because “marriage is the primordial human institution, a reality that existed long before the establishment of what we now know as the state.”


    RNS photo by David Jolkovski
    Maggie Gallagher, co-founder of the National Organization for Marriage, says religious advocacy groups need political structures to endorse or oppose individual candidates if they want to be effective.


    “(W)hat the state defines as marriage no longer embodies God’s purposes in creation,” says the 5,000-word statement, which was first reported by Baptist Press. “An easy acceptance of divorce damages marriage; widespread cohabitation devalues marriage. But so-called same-sex marriage is a graver threat, because what is now given the name of marriage in law is a parody of marriage.”
    Signers of the statement include popular megachurch pastor Rick Warren and longtime gay marriage foe Maggie Gallagher, as well as prominent conservative Catholic intellectuals George Weigel and Robert George.
    Timothy George, a Southern Baptist and dean of Samford University’s Beeson Divinity School; Mark Galli, editor of the evangelical magazine Christianity Today; and J.I. Packer of Regent University also endorsed the statement.
    The signers say they “do not dispute the evident fact of hormonal and chromosomal irregularities, nor of different sexual attractions and desires.” But they say that in legitimating same-sex marriage, “a kind of alchemy is performed, not merely on the institution, but on human nature itself.”
    “We are today urged to embrace an abstract conception of human nature that ignores the reality of our bodies. Human beings are no longer to be understood as either male or female,” it says. The result, it says, will undermine society by eliminating any moral compass except that which the state declares to be the norm, to the exclusion of all others.
    The document declares that a “faithful Christian witness cannot accommodate itself to same-sex marriage,” and it suggests that believers who accept gay marriage are no longer fully Christian.
    The signers themselves do not offer a detailed plan of action to counter gay marriage, which is now legal in 36 states and the District of Columbia, and pending in several others. Reno said the statement was not intended as a road map for political or judicial action, but more as a rallying cry to Christians and “to disabuse folks of the notion that we can just keep on keeping on as we have been.”
    The signers raise the possibility – which has been debated among religious conservatives in recent months – that clergy could refuse to sign state marriage licenses as an act of civil disobedience.
    But they conclude simply that “whatever courses of action are deemed necessary, the coming years will require careful discernment.” They say that the best strategy is for Christians themselves and others “of good will” to live lives that are faithful examples of traditional marriage. “On this basis alone can we succeed,” they say.
    (EDITOR’S NOTE – David Gibson is a national reporter for Religion News Service.)

    2/2/2015 2:37:51 PM by David Gibson, Religion News Service | with 1 comments
    Filed under: politics, religious liberty, same-sex marriage

Clyde Baker
The document states, "“We are today urged to embrace an ABSTRACT CONCEPTION of human nature that ignores the reality of our bodies." That statement contradicts the very premise and character of marriage! Marriage is and always has been built upon many ABSTRACT CONCEPTIONS instead of natural biology...i.e. fidelity, family, property, income, labor sharing, inheritance, emotional support, understanding, partnership...on and on. This document wants to toss out all these vital conceptions that make up marriage and drag it down to purely biological breeding. And they claim this is Christian? It's not even logical.
2/2/2015 8:34:35 PM

 Security code