March 2 2009 by Melissa Deming, Baptist Press

    HORSESHOE BAY, Texas — Nothing catalyzes Americans to action more than the violation of personal physical freedom, WORLD magazine founder Joel Belz said during the annual Association of State Baptist Papers’ Feb. 10-13 annual meeting in Horseshoe Bay, Texas, Feb. 10-13.
     
    Belz, commenting on Western culture’s captivation with civil liberties, warned against a grosser perversion of the God-given gift of physical freedom that occurs not at gunpoint but in a “quiet embezzlement while no one is watching.”
     
    “We do not have to fear atomic bombs; we do need to fear godless men and their ideas,” said Belz, quoting the late Fulton J. Sheen, an American Roman Catholic bishop who had a weekly TV program in the 1950s.
     
    Admitting it may sound “overly cheap and almost obscene” to assert that civil liberties are not at the core of the true meaning of freedom, Belz stated that physical freedom and freedom of religion are not the ultimate issues of liberty.
     
    Noting he could easily set the stage for a discussion of freedom by referencing Muslim extremists, or North Korea and Iran’s nuclear capabilities, Belz instead called attention to Jesus’ words in Matthew 10:28: “Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the one who can destroy both soul and body in hell.”
     
    “There is a strange tendency among us all when we take up the issue of liberty in general and religious liberty in particular to reduce the discussion to somehow its most tangible and visible aspects,” said Belz in one of his three addresses during the meeting of Baptist state paper editors. “So, we measure liberty’s progress overly much in terms of the absence of literal chains — the absence of literal jail cells, the absence of literal guns or the absence, in Muslim terms, of literal gallows.”
     
    Americans think of themselves as free people primarily because the country has been spared from physical restraint in the form of a totalitarian government or repressive religious regime, Belz said. Careful not to minimize God’s gracious dealings toward the American nation, he said WORLD magazine often carries reports of the global persecution of the church.
     
    “Nonetheless, I hope we still always see such reports in their right perspective. That perspective is that throughout the long history of God’s people, from Old Testament times until this very moment, persecution and the loss of civil liberty and the reduction of personal freedom have been among the very best gifts that God ever gives to His children,” Belz said. “... (T)he blood of martyrs throughout the history of the church wonderfully watered the church as thousands of able young people committed their lives to the preaching of the Gospel around the world.”
     
    As such, Belz said, liberty is neither an end itself nor is it a personal right. Instead, liberty should be viewed as a gift.
     
    “Freedom and liberty of this sort are gifts God graciously extends to some of His servants, just as to some He gives good health or financial prosperity or beautiful children. But we should never fall into the trap of supposing that the state of political liberty or civic freedom is the norm for God’s people — just as we do not expect that He owes us perfect health, or a big bank account, or deliverance from Wall Street, or beautiful children.”
     
    The fact that the nation has been largely spared from physical enslavement has both spoiled and blinded the church, Belz said, noting that “God’s goodness might be even more extravagantly expressed to His people when he sends us to Egypt or to Babylon.”
     
    “The irony in all this may be that in our aversion to physical bondage and to persecution we have such a remarkable tendency to fall into bondage to a very different taskmaster — our love for freedom,” Belz said.
     
    And in a culture built on Patrick Henry’s famous credo, “Give me liberty or give me death,” Belz said one only has to look at the annals of history to see the abuse of freedom paves the way for nominalism in the church.
     
    “... I’m going to ask you to ponder the extent to which we, right here in America, have come to overly worship the gift of freedom that God has given us — more than the giver of that gift Himself,” Belz said, alluding to America’s “love affair” with the Declaration of Independence. “Just as we do with some of His other good gifts, we make freedom a false god, pushing from His rightful place the God that may or may not choose to give us such freedom. We come to the point of insisting this gift is instead our birthright.”
     
    While agreeing that bondage is something from which to ask God’s deliverance, Belz proposed that “loss of liberty” also could serve as part of God’s plan of enrichment for His followers.
     
    “We have been of the mindset that atom bombs, along with some lesser but still physical weapons, are what we really need to fear. We really are more afraid of atom bombs than we are of the ideas of godless men,” Belz said. People are “all too cavalier about the evil one who walks about seeking whom he may devour with wrong words and mistaken ideas.”
     
    Real danger, Belz said, lies not in physical bondage, but in ideological and spiritual bondage.
     
    “Another way of saying this is simply that ideas are always stronger than prison walls and prisoners’ chains,” Belz said, pointing to the victorious tone of much of the Bible’s prison literature.
     
    “Whether it is Paul the apostle writing to the Romans or John Bunyan the Puritan writing ‘Pilgrim’s Progress’ or Martin Luther King Jr., the civil rights activist, writing from his Birmingham jail, great ideas have the wonderful propensity to leap over prison walls and to break the chains,” Belz said, noting that the opposite also rings true.
     
    “Wrong ideas imprison people who may otherwise seem to be free,” Belz said. “That’s why millions of people who have developed dreams of sexual freedom in their minds are instead slaves of those very dreams and their resulting preferences and habits. It is why millions of others who built great arguments for the right to stimulate their bodies with chemical substances of all kinds are instead victimized by the fruits of their freedom. Women have championed the idea that the choice to keep or to destroy their babies is an illustration of great and unprecedented personal freedom — and then those same women find themselves struggling by the tens of thousands with the nightmare of guilt.
     
    “We suggest with our lives and our actions and our priorities that ideas are not nearly as scary as atom bombs,” Belz said. “We are quite sure that we can listen to ideas and read them and discuss them and toss them back and forth like balloons floating in the air — all with no ultimate effect on our souls until we consciously give them our permission to have [an effect]....
     
    “We envision this big laboratory where ideas can be measured and weighed and analyzed and put in incubators and taken out at scheduled hours. We are incredibly casual about guarding ourselves, who are the laboratory workers, with sterile processes and with proper insulations and proper precautions against the terrible toxins we are handling. In short, we overrate ourselves and our abilities to resist alien ideas.”
     
    No better illustrations can be found than in the fields of education and entertainment, Belz said.
     
    “Bluntly stated, education can’t afford for any of its slaves to taste freedom. Just try to place a book arguing the merits of creationism in a public school library. Try to discuss the theological distinctives of those people we used to call Pilgrims in the social studies classroom of most state schools,” he said, noting that the arduous debate surrounding these and similar issues has resulted in “handcuffs and leg irons on the minds and souls of tens of hundreds of thousands of young people in our society.”
     
    However, Belz said, the results of such censorship are more grievous than the actual methods employed to restrict conservative thought.
     
    “The worst part of all is that the poor children don’t, for the most part, have a clue of what they are being deprived of. To take away a young person’s physical freedoms is evil, but if that young person at least knows what’s going on, he or she can still resist with the mind and the soul. Such a person can even plot a means of escape.
     
    “But to take away one’s freedom even to think certain thoughts because those thoughts are not popular with the majority, and to do that in a way that the young person isn’t even aware that there were alternatives to that pattern — that removal of freedom represents a kind of heinousness multiplied many times over,” Belz said. “For, now, the victim does not even know of his or her own imprisonment.”
     
    While the content of state education is typically fought on issues such as history, evolution and sexual morality, Belz asserted that the root problem of American classrooms lies in its neglect of truth.
     
    “The ultimate wrongheadedness of statist education is that it fails even to convey to students a sense that there is a difference between truth and falsehood, between right and wrong, and thereby condemns those students to the most piteous sort of tyranny and bondage,” Belz said. “I would a thousand times rather that my children be chained in a literal dungeon, yet still with the knowledge that they were prisoners, than to be apparently free as birds but unaware of some spiritual or mental shackles that bind and prevent them from what they ought to be.”
     
    “The older I get, the more I am persuaded that is where we have lost our grip on godliness,” Belz said. “And it is where we have become the slaves of our increasingly post-Christian culture rather than enjoying the liberty God has intended us to enjoy.
     
    “Let’s stop telling everybody how ungodly the culture around us is and ask God’s Spirit to help us, however modestly, construct a godly culture,” Belz said. “Until we do that, we are truly godless people who will, by our very failures to incorporate God’s character in our daily living, continue to become our own captors.”
     
    Citing a recent Barna study indicating that out of 240 million Americans who claim to be Christians fewer than 25 million are actively seeking God’s guidance in everyday life, Belz said: “Our problem today in a cultural sense is not nearly so much the awfulness of the secularism and paganism that are out there. Our problem, instead, is our own persistent illusion that we can keep fighting a battle of any kind while the fuel gauge on our very own vehicles sits so perilously close to empty. We’ve got a culture to confront ... and I don’t want to diminish that a bit, but I also want us to remember we don’t do it with empty gas tanks.”
     
    (EDITOR’S NOTE — Deming is a correspondent for the Southern Baptist TEXAN, newsjournal of the Southern Baptists of Texas Convention.)

    3/2/2009 6:25:00 AM by Melissa Deming, Baptist Press | with 2 comments
    Filed under: culture, liberty




Comments
Cyrus B. Fletcher
Mr. Belz and Dr. Willingham go to great lengths to promote Calvinism, fundamentalistic world views, and denigrate anyone one or any idea that deviates from their pre-conceived notions. But to champion such men as John Bunyon and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. while saying religious liberty and freedom of conscience borders on the theological doofus factor. The phrase that comes to my mind is 'over zealous theological correctness.' It is really no more helpful to gaining Godliness that political correctness is in gaining good government. Cy Fletcher, Texas
3/3/2009 12:44:52 AM

Dr. James Willingham
Mr. Belz had many good things to say, but the defensive modality explains in part how Christians lost the position of leadership in America. The mentality which we need, and the one I advocate, is all others need to fear that we will infect them with the view of true godliness. That is what happened in the first two centuries, and that is what happened during the Great Awakenings and the Great Century of Missions. What happened afterwards was that certain groups wanted to blunt the awakening force as it threatened their aims for the world. Truth will out regardless of the opposition. We are going to have the Third Great Awakening, the one which wins (by persuasion - not force) the whole earth in one generation and even a thousand generations. It might be that the force of evil will so succeed that as C. S. Lewis suggested in his sci-fi work, That Hideous Strength, that they pull down deep heaven upon their heads. A Great Awakening involves a certain theology and the coming down of Heaven to earth in conjunction with that theology. That theology is the most intensely evangelistic of all theologies; it is the founding theology of Southern Baptists beyond a shadow of a doubt and it is inviting to the nth degree. I am almost embarrassed to say what it is in view of the fact that so many who think it represents fatalism and indifference. One would almost think that none of them ever heard of paradoxical intervention, a psychological technique used by psychiatrists, psychologists, and come counselors as a therapy for some conditions. Surely God is is even more perceptive of what is required in falling man's case. They knew this in the 1700s, and that is why Gano, Stearns, Craig, Leland, Mercer, Marshall, Screvens, Backus, Taylor, Furman, Manly, and a host of others agreed with John Newton that grace was amazing. In short, they believed in Sovereign Grace, and they were willing to admit that they were wretches saved by such grace. I must also mention the greatest theologian America ever produced, Jonathan Edwards, and the great Episcopal Evangelist who unified America with theology, George Whitefield. This view is coming back, because people have been praying for another Great Awakening. In order to have such awakening, the true theology and the presence of Heaven is needed. The result will be as it was then: the transformation of society, greater freedom with true and real responsibility on the part of the individual, and the spread of the Gospel, changing lives, homes, and expectations. Abraham's seed is to be numerous like the sand by the seashore and the stars of heaven. That being the case, something remarkable must happen. And, God willing as He has promised, it will. The question is not if; it is when.
3/2/2009 10:04:06 PM

Subscribe
 Security code