fbpx
×

Log into your account

We have changed software providers for our subscription database. Old login credentials will no longer work. Please click the "Register" link below to create a new account. If you do not know your new account number you can contact [email protected]
Kansas-Nebraska reduces CP allocation
BP Staff
October 06, 2010
2 MIN READ TIME

Kansas-Nebraska reduces CP allocation

Kansas-Nebraska reduces CP allocation
BP Staff
October 06, 2010

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (BP) — The Kansas-Nebraska Convention of Southern Baptists has reduced the percentage of Cooperative Program receipts forwarded to Southern Baptists’ national and international causes from 32 percent to 22 percent, the convention’s news publication has reported.

Two factors caused the decision, according to Ron Pracht, president of the Kansas-Nebraska convention: the impact of the economic recession on churches; and diversion of cooperative missions funds into direct missions causes.

The action is retroactive to the first of the year and is temporarily in place through the remainder of the year.

The CP reduction was approved by 40 members of the convention’s mission board while one board member registered opposition, Pratt reported in a front-page column in the September edition of the Baptist Digest, the KNCSB’s news publication.

“Because of the state of the economy across Kansas and Nebraska and because some churches in KNCSB have chosen to redirect some of their mission dollars in light of the adoption of the Great Commission Resurgence Task Force report, we need to consider a redirection of funds received through KNCSB,” Pracht wrote.

“Great Commission Giving” was endorsed by the Great Commission Resurgence Task Force Report. However, messengers to the SBC annual meeting in Orlando this past June adopted the report and recommendations only after an amendment was made that emphasized “that designated giving to special causes is to be given as a supplement to the Cooperative Program and not as a substitute for Cooperative Program giving.”

“This was a difficult and painful decision for us to make,” Pracht wrote in the Digest. “As I told the members of the Mission Board [80] percent of our budget is invested in people … Short of massive layoffs or significant pay cuts, this was the best short term alternative we could find.”

In an accompanying editorial Digest editor Tim Boyd wrote that without the action by the convention’s mission board, mission work in the two-state convention would have been crippled.

While the GCR recommendations challenged churches to give sacrificially so the gospel could be taken to people groups that have yet to hear it, Boyd expressed concern in his editorial that some congregations are redirecting money away from initiatives to reach their cities, states, and nation in order to boost giving to international projects.