Marijuana’s potency & what churches can do
    January 29 2014 by Barrett Duke, ERLC/Baptist Press

    WASHINGTON – President Obama’s recent comments about marijuana are very troubling. Having smoked marijuana myself for many years as a teenager and young adult, I can say that the president’s claim that marijuana is less dangerous than alcohol is an inadequate comparison.
    Both alcohol and marijuana are dangerous. To say one thing is less dangerous than another doesn’t mean very much if both things are extremely dangerous.
    Claiming alcohol is more dangerous than marijuana is essentially a distinction without a difference. Marijuana is associated with a long list of physical and psychological problems.
    Further, the Justice Department’s own statistics indicate marijuana is associated more often with other criminal behavior than any other illicit drug. In a 2002 Department of Justice survey of convicted inmates in jail, 14 percent reported using marijuana at the time of their offense – more than cocaine/crack at 11 percent. In addition, marijuana is acknowledged by millions of users and multiple studies as the gateway to even more destructive drugs.
    Contrary to alcohol, marijuana almost cannot be taken in moderate doses. It is nearly immediately debilitating upon the first intake. Alcohol impairs the user at practically any level of use as well, but its strongest effects require higher levels of usage.
    Marijuana is more powerful in smaller doses. This is even truer today than it was back when the president and I were smoking it. The higher potency levels of today’s marijuana compared to that of the ‘60s and ‘70s is well documented. But even when the president and I were smoking marijuana, it didn’t take much to thoroughly incapacitate a person.
    The president is correct to maintain the current administrative policy toward marijuana as a Schedule I drug. It is a dangerous substance that will be made more destructive if the federal government relaxes its position. The president’s latest comments about the dangerous nature of marijuana are damaging enough. He would be better served to look more closely at the current facts about marijuana than to depend on his own experience.
    Millions of lives are at stake in the debate over marijuana. I agree that we need to make sure we aren’t locking up young adults with hardened criminals for recreational marijuana use. Instead, we need more effective deterrent and rehabilitative programs. I agree that we need to address any racial disparity that exists in current drug enforcement policies. But making marijuana more available or reducing the penalty or stigma associated with its use is not going to help those using it now. Instead it is going to result in more use and more associated problems.

    What churches can do

    As our country continues to engage in the debate about marijuana, we must remember that the young people in our churches are listening and watching. We must make sure we help them understand the importance of personal purity and the dangers of marijuana and other drugs. Here are seven things a church can do to help keep their youth away from marijuana and other dangerous substances:
    1. Teach what the Bible says about proper treatment of our bodies. Our bodies are God’s creation, and for those in Christ, they are the temple of the Holy Spirit. As such, everyone, including young people, should do their best to keep themselves healthy and sober.
    2. Teach young people their worth in God’s eyes. They should be made aware that their lives matter. They should be taught that God has a plan for their lives and that they should seek His plan.
    3. Encourage adults in the church to practice abstinence toward alcoholic beverages. Young people have trouble distinguishing the difference between alcohol and marijuana use. To simply say one is legal and the other isn’t is not persuasive to youth curious about marijuana. This certainly won’t be much of a deterrent now that some states are legalizing it.
    4. Hold Christ-centered substance abuse awareness seminars. Parents should be made aware of the signs of substance abuse and be equipped to minister to a child who has fallen under its power. These seminars can also help young people and church members understand the dangers of substance abuse.
    5. Develop wholesome, enjoyable activities and ministries that offer young people in the church good alternatives to non-Christian venues. Make sure there is a strong emphasis on discipleship in these as well.
    6. Promote ministry opportunities for young people in the church that can help them focus on service to God and others rather than self. Teens are looking for ways to make their lives count. These activities can help them develop direction and purpose in their lives.
    7. Remind youth of the Lordship of Christ. Christian teens must be made aware of the reality that their lives are not their own. Having trusted Christ as Savior and Lord, they must put Him first, above all else.
    (EDITOR’S NOTE – Barrett Duke is vice president for public policy and research for the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission.)
    1/29/2014 12:36:27 PM by Barrett Duke, ERLC/Baptist Press | with 3 comments
    Filed under: marijuana, Obama

Mr Duke:
I think you should respond to the facts and statistics raised by "Crut," which would appear to completely undercut your argument that cannabis is at least as dangerous as alcohol. What say you?
1/29/2014 3:53:38 PM

Jeff Rowse
Dear Mr. Duke. Thank you for your article. Every facet of society needs to be heard from on this fast moving issue. If you would, please clarify "almost cannot be" and "nearly immediately debilitating". As Yogi Berra said, "If you don't know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else."
1/29/2014 3:07:14 PM

Sir, I respectfully disagree with you. It seems you are cherry picking data to fit your narrative.

--"Claiming alcohol is more dangerous than marijuana is essentially a distinction without a difference."

It's really interesting that after this statement, you proceed to talk about some of the "long list of physical and psychological problems" of Cannabis without offering the "long list of physical and psychological problems" associated with alcohol. The most obvious physical difference being the effects of overdosing... With weed, I can supposedly lose a coupe of IQ points (that study is not conclusive), but with alcohol, I can lose ALL OF THEM.

To address your specific point:
--"marijuana is associated more often with other criminal behavior than any other illicit drug 14 percent"

What is the same association with Alcohol? I noticed you specified "illicit" to clarify your statistic, so I looked up the numbers at the Justice Department on page 8 of a government website and found the Alcohol statistic to be 33%. So what is that association telling us? Because the only thing it tells me is that criminals are twice as likely to abuse alcohol before committing a crime, rather than marijuana. Doesn't seem to be a distinction that lends to the logic that Cannabis should be a Schedule 1 drug, and Alcohol is free and clear.

I get it, you don't like marijuana any more. That's fine and dandy. Live your life like you have been doing and just keep avoiding it. Once it becomes legal, you don't have to go into that new store, or ask the clerk at the gas station for a quarter. It's called personal responsibility, not government/society responsibility.

"Marijuana is more powerful"

Yes, overall it is. And this is one of those pesky "unintended consequences" of Prohibition. Back in the 1920's during Alcohol Prohibition, the alcohol primarily sold on the black market wasn't beer, it was whiskey, gin etc. Given a choice in a (LEGAL) market, a user is more likely to choose a LESS debilitating product when there are no legal repercussions. The same will be true, regardless of the substance in question.

You will notice that I have not engaged in any attack in my rebuttal, and would ask to keep this discussion on civil terms.
1/29/2014 2:51:11 PM